Kelcie Moseley-Morris

By Kelcie Moseley-Morris

Doctors affiliated with the American Association of Pro-Life OBGYNs, an organization that frequently advocates for abortion restrictions, say Virginia’s proposed constitutional amendment protecting abortion access would make it too easy for people to obtain the procedure at any stage of pregnancy. (Photo by Charlotte Rene Woods/Virginia Mercury)

Doctors affiliated with the American Association of Pro-Life OBGYNs, an organization that frequently advocates for abortion restrictions, say Virginia’s proposed constitutional amendment protecting abortion access would make it too easy for people to obtain the procedure at any stage of pregnancy. (Photo by Charlotte Rene Woods/Virginia Mercury)

Virginia currently allows abortion through the second trimester of pregnancy, and beyond that in certain circumstances with the approval of three doctors testifying that it’s necessary to save the pregnant patient’s life. 

The state legislature, with a Democratic majority, referred a constitutional amendment to the November ballot that would ensure access to abortion, birth control and other reproductive care, while also reducing the number of physicians needed to approve a procedure in the third trimester from three to one. 

A group of physicians with Virginia Medical Professionals for Women’s Safety say the proposal goes too far, arguing it raises questions of safety and would make it too easy for people to get an abortion, Virginia Mercury reports. 

Dr. Edward Springel, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at VCU Health in Richmond, said he doesn’t support abortions for “social reasons” and he thinks removing the three-physician requirement adds risk. 

Indiana-based OB-GYN Dr. Christina Francis, who is CEO of the national anti-abortion group American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said the amendment would allow abortions to be performed by “unlicensed providers in unlicensed facilities,” according to the Mercury, but proponents of the amendment say that’s not true. 

The Mercury also spoke to Virginia women who needed abortion access during their pregnancies, including one woman who had a miscarriage that led to a potentially deadly infection, and another who developed a life-threatening condition during her first pregnancy that led to an emergency cesarean section. Knowing she had abortion access if that condition developed again before viability was the only way she felt safe having another child, she said. 

THE BEAT
South Carolina advocates for women and children are pushing for Congress to continue the federal Maternal Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting program, which is scheduled for renewal in 2027. The program assists women during and after pregnancy. (Getty Images)

South Carolina advocates for women and children are pushing for Congress to continue the federal Maternal Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting program, which is scheduled for renewal in 2027. The program assists women during and after pregnancy. (Getty Images)

IDAHO
LDS Church makes $1 million donation to campaign against abortion rights initiative: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints donated $1 million last week to the political action committee opposing the initiative that would restore abortion access in Idaho. It is by far the largest donation of any religious group in the campaign against the ballot measure so far. In a statement, the church said it remains neutral toward political candidates but “actively addresses ballot initiatives it believes carry significant moral consequences.” — Idaho Capital Sun

SOUTH CAROLINA
Advocates want in-home program that helps 2,800 new South Carolina moms and babies to continue: The federal Maternal Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting program is scheduled to be renewed by Congress in 2027, and South Carolina family advocates hope the funds will continue. The program assists pregnant women with services such as transportation to doctor’s appointments, obtaining prenatal vitamins and healthy food, and substance abuse support. It also helps mothers who may have postpartum depression or who need support with breastfeeding and sleep schedules.  — South Carolina Daily Gazette

OKLAHOMA
One rural Oklahoma hospital is bringing back maternity care, but faces threats under upcoming healthcare cuts: A little more than one-quarter of Oklahoma’s rural hospitals offer labor and delivery services, and as of 2024, half of the state’s counties had no obstetricians. New federal grant funding for rural healthcare has allowed one northwest Oklahoma hospital to restore maternity services, but staff say they’re already facing an uphill battle as $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts are scheduled to go into effect in 2027.  — Oklahoma Voice

THE PULSE
  • TX: Why Texas’ maternal death report was pushed until after the midterm elections | Texas Observer

  • US: Inside the covert network of people transporting abortion pills internationally | Mother Jones 

ABORTION ACCESS IN THE U.S.

Track state-level developments on reproductive rights anytime at News From The States. Send tips and thoughts to ✉️ [email protected], , and follow her on Bluesky @kelciemmorris.bsky.social.

And if you enjoyed today's edition, forward this email to a friend.